On Demand Wisconsin Portal image
 
header graphic 

Link to Governor Doyle's web site

Link to Commerce's Employment webpage

Link to wisconsin.gov web site
 

Division of Investment and Export
PO Box 7970
Madison, WI 53707-7970
USA
Wisconsin Worldwide Newsletter Logo Subscribe
Send to a Colleague
Feedback
View Past Editions
Vol. 7 #5, May 2008

$400,000 Fine for Export Violations
MTS Systems Corp., of Eden Prairie, MN, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to two years probation and a $400,000 fine in connection with submitting false export license applications involving proposed shipments to India.  Pursuant to the plea agreement, the court also ordered MTS to implement and maintain a model export compliance program and to sponsor an export compliance conference to be held at a future date.

MTS manufactures and sells test systems throughout the world, including some determined to be involved in unregulated nuclear activities.  After India conducted nuclear weapons tests in 1998, the United States prohibited U.S. companies from exporting certain goods and services to various Indian entities without first obtaining an export license. 

In 2002, MTS evaluated a purchase inquiry from a potential Indian customer and determined that it might be destined for an inappropriate user or destination.  An MTS representative in India confirmed that the customer would be using the MTS equipment for testing nuclear power plant components. MTS, therefore, was required to obtain an export license from the Commerce Department.  The MTS employee in charge of export compliance stated that it was “extremely unlikely” that it would gain approval for the export unless the customer could make a “strong and convincing” argument that this test system would not make a significant contribution to India’s nuclear energy programs.  When MTS electronically filed a license application, the stated end-use was “for seismic calibration testing facility to test motors and other electronic equipment under earthquake conditions.” The license application did not reflect the company’s true knowledge of intended nuclear end-use and was therefore considered a criminal act.